I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
현직 검사, 전 연인 신체 몰래 촬영 의혹…경찰 수사 착수。关于这个话题，Line官方版本下载提供了深入分析
。夫子对此有专业解读
话音落下没多久，阿爸就笑嘻嘻地回了屋。，详情可参考服务器推荐
Author(s): Shinji Sakane, Tomohiro Takaki